![]() However, I do still have to address the original encoding problem. I've played around with JW FLV player a bit now and am much happier with it. Yeh, you guys were all right about the video player scaling poorly. This way you are not limited to just "main" profile (you can use "high"), and have many more settings you can customize. Most of them have presets and profiles which make things easier. Xvid4PSP, ripbot264, MeGUI, Handbrake, dozens more. Once you get the 1st problem solved regarding blocking/resizing upon viewing, you can look at farther improving quality at low bitrates using x264. ![]() ![]() There must be something on the server side/application that is not set properly. This is how it should look and does look nativelyģ: This is resized using a decent resizer (Spline36) Every frame has resizing artifacts and poor antialiasing from the bad resizeĢ: This is directly from the downloaded video. The blocks and artifacting are clear near the plane wingġ: This is directly from your web application viewed "as is". These are png lossless captures, so not from jpg compression artifacts. The settings and encoder do play a role, but less so in this case. The combination of the 2 is making this look bad What else can I do to make it look better at the chosen res and bitrate?Īctually on closer examination (the streaming video is downloaded to the temp internet directory), it has to do with the way your application resizes the video and the display settings - it is using a poor quality resizer, and as jagabo pointed out, the deblocking isn't working as it should be. I choose the "use deblocking filter" option (not sure what that is, but it seems like it should help?) and also "number of reference frames" =1 (not sure what that is either). I am using Sony Vegas AVC render option to make my mp4 files. Even the 720p version I think has a little too much blockiness, compared to Vimeo or something with similar bitrate. I am aware that 320p 500kbps is never going to look great, but I think this is as high bitrate (if not better) than what Youtube uses for 320p, and I don't usually see the huge blocky artifacts on Youtube. I am pretty happy with how the 720p version looks, but I think the 320p version looks crappy, mainly it has lots of large "blocky" artifacts. The "Watch (standard)" links take you to 568x320, 500kbps (vid) H.264 mp4.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |